Scientific record track35% |
Professional track record40% |
Letter15% |
DocumentalEvaluation90% |
% |
|
Cristina Alberto | 10 | 14 | 10 | 10,6 | 58,9+ |
Ana Rita Farias | 16 | 16 | 16 | 14,4 | 80,0* |
Raquel Costa | 17 | 15 | 16 | 14,35 | 79,7* |
Heather Dodds | 10 | 13 | 12 | 10,5 | 58,3+ |
Susana Novais Santos | 13 | 17 | 16 | 13,75 | 76,4* |
Aliny Lamoglia de Carvalho | 10 | 13 | 13 | 10,65 | 59,2+ |
Karri Chiranjeevi | Excluded | PhD<5 yrs | |||
Phil Lopes | Excluded | PhD<5 yrs | |||
Miguel Venda da Graça Nery | Excluded | No WP |
*Candidates with evaluation higher than 60% will be contacted for an interview
+Candidates who did not reached 60% to be interviewed
Documents |
Interview |
Final score |
|||||
35% |
40% |
15% |
90% |
10% |
|||
Scientific track record |
Professional track record |
Letter |
Docs evaluation |
% |
|||
Ana Rita Farias |
16 |
16 |
16 |
14,4 |
80,0 |
17,0 |
16,1 |
Raquel Costa |
17 |
15 |
16 |
14,35 |
79,7 |
15,0 |
15,9 |
Susana Novais Santos |
13 |
17 |
16 |
13,75 |
76,4 |
14,0 |
15,2 |